MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312677333 · doi:10.2196/39034

User Experience Regarding Digital Primary Health Care in Santarém, Amazon: Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Doctor’s Feedback

2022· article· en· W4312677333 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kaio Jia Bin, Patrícia Gabriela Santana Alves, Raquel Miranda Costa, Paula Cruz Eiras, Luciano Nader de Araújo, Antônio José Rodrigues Pereira, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho, Ana María Malik

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade de São Paulo
KeywordsTelemedicineAmazon rainforestFamily medicinePopulationPatient satisfactionMedicineUnit (ring theory)Health careDigital healthUser satisfactionNursingGeographyMedical emergencyEnvironmental healthPsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: With the arrival of the pandemic, telemedicine has been widely used to provide medical care and can be used to assist patients in regions far from urban centers that are difficult to access, such as riverside communities in the Brazilian Amazon region. A telemedicine project connecting São Paulo, a mega-metropolis, to Paysandú, a riverside district in the Amazon, was built to serve the local population where access to the nearest medical care is 6 hours away by speedboat. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the feedback from patients and doctors regarding the use of telemedicine in outpatient care at Paysandú, a riverside district in the Amazon. METHODS: This is a single-center study following the guidelines "Evaluating digital health products" from Public Health England, with local adaptations for the project and the Brazilian reality, that was conducted between São Paulo and Santarém in Brazil. A survey was carried out with patients who were treated by a doctor in the city of São Paulo, about 2500 km from the local basic health unit, between September 27 to December 15, 2021. At the end of each teleconsultation, the attending physician answered an administrative survey form, and the patient answered a satisfaction survey. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients completed the satisfaction survey from a total of 220 consultations carried out during the period (95% CI margin error 0.22%). According to the survey, more than 95% of patients were satisfied with the service, 87.4% (n=97) had previous experience with videoconferencing, and 76.6% (n=85) reported that their demand was fully solved. Additionally, according to the hired doctor's feedback, the average duration of the consultations was between 15 and 20 minutes. Of the 220 teleconsultations performed, 90.9% (n=200) of the demands were solved with support from the local health team, and 99.1% (n=218) of the appointments had a problem with audio or video. CONCLUSIONS: This teleconsultation project between São Paulo and Paysandú showed that it is possible to offer medical care from more developed locations to communities far from urban centers, as is the case with Paysandú District. Beyond the feasibility of the infrastructure, acceptance and satisfaction among patients were high. This health care supply model has proven to be functional and should be expanded nationally or perhaps internationally to regions lacking medical assistance. Escalation of the project does not seem too difficult once infrastructure issues are solved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.392 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative ResearchSame topicTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationFrench-language works237,207