Comparing Increasing Tryptophan:Lysine Ratios in DDGS-Based Diets with or without a DDGS Withdrawal Strategy on Growth Performance and Iodine Value of Growing-Finishing Pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A total of 6,240 pigs (DNA 600 × PIC 1050; initially 49.7 × 2.23 lb), divided into 2 groups, were used in a 119- or 120-d study to compare increasing the Trp:Lys ratio in diets with DDGS or a DDGS withdrawal strategy on growth performance and carcass fat iodine value of grow-finish pigs. Pigs were randomly allotted to 1 of 7 dietary treatments with 30 to 36 pigs per pen and 26 replications per treatment. Diets were fed in 4 phases (approximately 50 to 96, 96 to 157, 157 to 220, and 220 lb to market). Diets included a control corn-soybean meal-based diet formulated to a 19% SID Trp:Lys ratio; 4 diets with 30% DDGS fed in all four phases and formulated to achieve a 16%, 19%, 22%, or 25% SID Trp:Lys ratio, respectively; and 2 DDGS withdrawal strategy diets: 19% SID Trp:Lys with 30% DDGS in phases 1 through 3 and then 0% DDGS in phase 4 with either a 19 or 25% Trp:Lys ratio. Overall, BW, ADG, ADFI, and F/G improved (linear, P < 0.05) as the SID Trp:Lys ratio increased in diets with 30% DDGS fed in all 4 phases. Hot carcass weight and carcass yield increased (quadratic, P < 0.05) as the Trp:Lys ratio increased along with backfat depth (linear, P = 0.040). Pigs fed diets containing a SID Trp:Lys ratio of 19% and 30% DDGS from phases 1 through 3 and 0% DDGS in phase 4 had the greatest numeric ADG and ADFI for the overall study, but were not different than pigs fed the control, the 25% Trp:Lys withdrawal treatment, or the 30% DDGS diets with 25% Trp:Lys ratio throughout the study. Pigs fed the control diet had decreased (P < 0.05) carcass fat iodine value compared to pigs fed DDGS throughout the study, with pigs fed the two DDGS withdrawal strategies having lower (P < 0.05) iodine values compared to pigs fed 30% DDGS in all 4 phases. No significant differences (P > 0.05) in revenue per pen or IOFC per pen were observed, however, feed cost per lb of gain (quadratic, P = 0.001) and feed cost per pig placed (linear, P = 0.002) increased and revenue per pig placed tended to increase (P = 0.064) as the Trp:Lys ratio increased. In summary, increasing the SID Trp:Lys ratio in diets with 30% DDGS resulted in a linear improvement in ADG, ADFI, F/G,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".