MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312715003 · doi:10.1115/ipc2022-86988

Engineering Assessment of Substandard In-Line Isolation Split Fitting

2022· article· en· W4312715003 on OpenAlexaff
Ken Zhang, Ron Chune, Frank Cox, Chantz Denowh, Chris Alexander

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Fault Detection and Protection
Canadian institutionsAlberta Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharpy impact testFlangeStructural engineeringFracture mechanicsConsistency (knowledge bases)ToughnessPressure vesselMachiningReliability engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In-line isolation fittings used in TC Energy systems typically include a split tee assembly, flange, completion plug and bolt-up hardware, and often form part of an in-line isolation train plugging system during maintenance projects. Due to potential concerns about a few large-size split tee flanges not meeting required strength and toughness properties, TC Energy undertook a fitness-for-service assessment. This assessment involved physical proof testing coupled with high-fidelity continuum finite element analysis (FEA) and engineering critical assessment (ECA), accounting for material deficiencies and hypothetical fracture indications. Proof testing in excess of 2 times (2 x) maximum allowable pressure (MOP) at a temperature of −46°C was performed, which involved introducing strategically sized, positioned and oriented electrical discharge machining (EDM) notches to approximate hypothetical crack-like flaws. Both the analysis and full-scale pressure proof testing demonstrated that the flanges did not experience any form of crack growth, though mechanical destructive testing showed that at certain locations the Charpy V-notch (CVN) toughness was as low as 3 J. Analysis predicted high plastic strain, which was confirmed in the full-scale testing without causing plastic collapse, burst or propagation of the preexisting flaw introduced by EDM. Test results showed reasonable consistency with the analytical results, supporting the appropriateness of applying the proposed analytical approach to location-specific assessment for current and potential similar future issues. Based on the assessment, confidence has been gained that for split tee flanges with low toughness and low tensile strength. The testing validated analytical approach adopting sound design parameters with installation specific design loading is reasonable to determine fitness for service. The engineering assessment methods, testing setup, results and findings are summarized in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and JoiningSame topicElectrical Fault Detection and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207