MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312737157 · doi:10.1109/tnse.2022.3227317

Blockchain-Powered Tensor Meta-Learning-Driven Intelligent Healthcare System With IoT Assistance

2022· article· en· W4312737157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceBig dataUploadBlockchainEdge computingData modelingNode (physics)Differential privacyHealth careArtificial intelligenceDistributed computingComputer securityInternet of ThingsData scienceDatabaseData miningWorld Wide WebEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid development and gradual integration of artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things have brought unprecedented opportunities for radically changing healthcare and treatments. However, the burgeoning in intelligent healthcare systems is severely bounded by data privacy and the security of AI models. Meanwhile, the limited local data forces conventional AI models to face the predicament in achieving personalized healthcare. Hence, we propose a blockchain-powered tensor meta-learning-driven intelligent healthcare system with IoT assistance. IoT devices as light nodes upload the local shareable data to the edge server(full node) for model training and perform the local private data by non-tampered model downloaded via smart contract. The system can not only use blockchain technology to ensure the strong consistency of the healthcare model but also protect private data from being leaked. Especially, we develop a tensor meta-learning model named tensor-prototype graph network to achieve efficient modeling of heterogeneous healthcare data. Building on the tensors and graph network, the model is conducive to capturing the data distribution when there are few labeled data. To evaluate our proposed approach, we have conducted experiments on three classic databases. The results demonstrate that our approach is capable of effectively promoting the performance of intelligent healthcare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it