A Novel Hybrid Physics-Based and Data-Driven Approach for Degradation Trajectory Prediction in Li-Ion Batteries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries have been widely used in electric vehicles. To ensure safety and reliability, accurate prediction of the battery’s future degradation trajectory is critical. However, early prediction capability and adaptive prediction capability under various battery aging conditions remain two main challenges. Either physics-based or data-driven methods have their advantages and limitations. In this study, a novel hybrid method that combines the physics-based and data-driven approaches is proposed to achieve early prediction of the battery capacity degradation trajectory. This framework consists of three steps. First, to improve the generality of the method, a hybrid feature is extracted using an electrochemical model and measured voltage data. Second, the clustering algorithm is adopted to divide battery degradation data into different clusters, and the data augmentation technique is used to enrich the training dataset. Finally, the training dataset in each cluster is used to train the sequence-to-sequence deep neural network, and the future degradation trajectory can be predicted. The proposed method provides accurate predictions using only 20% of training data, and it has strong robustness under noisy input. Validation results under different aging conditions show that the mean absolute percentage errors of capacity degradation trajectory and remaining useable cycle life are below 2.5% and 6.5%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it