Imposing Connectome-Derived Topology on an Echo State Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Can connectome-derived constraints inform computation? In this paper we investigate the contribution of a fruit fly connectome's topology on the performance of an Echo State Network (ESN) - a subset of Reservoir Computing which is competitive in chaotic time series prediction. Specifically, we replace the reservoir layer of a classical ESN - normally a fixed, random graph represented as a 2-d matrix - with a particular (female) fruit fly connectome-derived connectivity matrix. We refer to this experimental class of models (with connectome-derived reservoirs) as “Fruit Fly ESNs” (FFESNs). We train and validate the FFESN on a chaotic time series prediction task; here we consider four sets of trials with different training input sizes (small, large) and train-validate splits (two variants). We compare the validation performance (Mean-Squared Error) of all of the best FFESN models to a class of control model ESNs (simply referred to as “ESNs”). Overall, for all four sets of trials we find that the FFESN either significantly outperforms (and has lower variance than) the ESN; or simply has lower variance than the ESN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".