GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM PEAT EXTRACTION SITES IN THE CENTER OF THE EUROPEAN PART OF RUSSIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes measured at a peat extraction site in the Moscow region in different seasons of 2005-2015 are considered. The average daily (taking into account intradaily dynamics) and average annual fluxes (emission factors) of CO2, CH4, and N2O from the interditch spacing (including microscale elevations and depressions) and drainage channels were estimated. The values of CO2 and N2O fluxes from the main interditch surface were equal to 3.3 t C-CO2/(ha year) and 1.1 kg N-N2O/(ha year), respectively; the value of the CH4 flux from the channel was 3200 kg CH4/(ha year). The resulting estimates are consistent with the default emission factors proposed for the “peatland under extraction” land category by the 2013 Supplement to the IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands. The results can be used for preparing the national report of the Russian Federation on the emission and absorption of greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".