The impact of e-democracy on social development in Ukraine: theoretical and practical approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Problem setting. The article reveals the peculiarities of the introduction of e-democracy in Ukraine, highlights the main tools of activity and gives the best practices of functioning. The perception and readiness of the society for the transition to the e-platform is shown. To achieve the goal set in the work, such general theoretical research methods as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison were used to determine the content and components of the concepts of “e-democracy” and “e-governance”; a systematic approach to generalize the main methodological approaches to the formation and essence of electronic democracy; methods of positive and normative analysis to develop recommendations for improving the e-democracy transformation model. And special (systematization, abstraction, decomposition) methods of scientific knowledge, with the help of which the article examines the theoretical foundations of the digital economy and carries out a critical comprehensive analysis and systematization of scientific and practical approaches to the interpretation of the essence of the principles and goals of e-democracy. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Problems of democracy and involvement of the public in policymaking by means of information and communication technologies were studied by C. Armstrong, Y. Harlan, S. Coleman, D. Lathrop, D. Robinson, L. Ruma, E. Felten, S. Schacht, D. Shuler and others However, the first attempts to bring politics online were made by engineer-enthusiasts at the request of the authorities in order to invent an alternative to the outdated routine practice. Such experimental projects as “E-Politics” in Minnesota (1994) and “Online Democracy for Citizens” in Great Britain (1996) were the first to build social networks and create discussion forums. Some local authorities in the Scandinavian countries, Canada, and Great Britain promoted and supported e-democracy projects, but most of them lacked legal regulation and resource provision. Тarget of the research. The article analyzes the concept of e-democracy, e-government. The international experience and developments in the field of e-democracy are determined in order to identify positive legal developments in the field of e-democracy. The actions of the Ukrainian government and parliament in the field of promoting e-democracy in Ukraine are analyzed. The activities that need to be regulated by the Ukrainian government for the further implementation of edemocracy are identified. Article’s main body. The purpose of the article is to systematize the concepts of e-democracy and e-government, to analyze international experience in the field of e-democracy in order to introduce into the domestic legal system positive legal experience in the field of regulating democratic processes, for the further development of new legal norms in the field of e-democracy and e-government , taking into account the need to form a new holistic worldview among its citizens based on global trends in the development of law, the science of public administration, etc. It was concluded that e-democracy should occupy a worthy place and enter the agenda of radical political reforms and become a component of public administration, especially at the current stage in the conditions of martial law. The study of the problem of e-democracy and e-governance, and the implementation of these institutions in Ukraine, is based on the approaches available in the Council of Europe regarding the essence, structure, features of e-democracy and its implementation. Conclusions and prospects for the development. E-democracy cannot be considered a panacea for all problems of democracy or public communications, but it undoubtedly contributes to the development of two, at the present stage, inseparable historical projects democracy and the Internet. Therefore, e-democracy should occupy a worthy place and enter the agenda of radical political reforms and become a component of public administration, especially at the current stage in the conditions of martial law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".