MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312823923 · doi:10.53103/cjlls.v2i6.69

An Insight into the Notion of Otherness in "Désirée’s Baby" and "That Evening Sun"

2022· article· en· W4312823923 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hanife Salbas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInjusticeAlienationTheme (computing)Prejudice (legal term)RacismCharacter (mathematics)CivilizationRelation (database)Face (sociological concept)Gender studiesSociologyHistoryWhite (mutation)PsychologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to analyze the notion of otherness, which is prevalent throughout the 19th century in America through the individual and environmental analysis of the main characters in two American short stories- "That Evening Sun" (1931) by William Faulkner and Kate Chopin’s "Désirée's Baby" (1893). The current study presents the common theme in the short stories of both Faulkner and Chopin, which demonstrates how racism, injustice, sexism, and prejudice were imposed on persons in the South during the antebellum era (about the middle of the 19th century to the early 20th century). The diminishing values that African American and female characters have to face are analyzed in the article comparing their situation in relation to gender and racial discrimination, and the way they are segregated from the society. Themes such as victimization, segregation, the isolating nature of inequality, alienation from society and civilization at large, and the position of African American women in the mid-19th century Southern United States are analyzed in this article through the symbolic elements present in both short stories. By opposing and contrasting the protagonists of the two stories and providing an in-depth analysis of the characteristics and motivations of each character, this article brings awareness to the issue of otherness in its broadest sense.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Language and Literature StudiesSame topicPoetry Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207