EKSISTENSI THE EXISTENCE OF QUARTER LIFE QRISIS PHENOMENON IN YOUNG ADULTS ON MENTAL HEALTH PRE-COVID-19 AND DURING COVID-19 IN THE COMMUNITY OF THE CITY OF PAREPARE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The formulation of the problem in this study is; (1) What is the impact of the quarter-life crisis, on adulthood before and before the pandemic; (2) How do the quarter-life crises in early adulthood affect mental health; (3) The effect of the Workshop on people who feel lost and even experience a quarter-life crisis. The aims of this study were: (1) to find out how the impact of the quarter-life crisis in early adulthood and before the pandemic; (2) to know the impact of the quarter-life crisis in early adulthood on mental health; (3) to Knowledge of the influence of the Workshop on people who feel lost and even experience the Crisis of a quarter of life. The benefits of this research. This type of research is exhibition fact research. The results showed that there was an effect of the quarter-life crisis on the prevention of Covid-19 in the people of Pare-Pare City as indicated by the value of Sig. 0.002 < 0.005 and there is an effect of a quarter of life crisis on mental health in the people of Pare-Pare City with a value of Sig. 0.014<0.05.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it