The study on the effectiveness of Introducing the full time prison chaplin: Throughout private prison workers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As one of the educational penalty in prison, there is religious education penalty through religious correction for inmates. There are non-full-time prison chaplin-prison religious committee- who participate their religious correction as a part-timer as an unpaid private volunteer like in korea and full-time prison chaplin who work full-time like Canada. But, various problems have been pointed out due to essential limitations of prison religious committee because it cannot keep up with this ideology even though the ideology of prison religious correction is carried out as prison religious correction welfare, Various solution to solve the problems was proposed, but it was biased toward the microscopic aspect and was not a fundamental alternative. The necessity of introduction of full-time prison chaplin came from the religious and academic circles from the perspective of its own reform, instead of the current prison religious committee system, like a military chaplin. But, arguments of religious aspect are limited in that religious missionary interests are secretly embedded and academia's arguments were also literature studies, and empirical studies were insufficient. Therefore, although empirical preceding studies on national prison officers have been published in 2021, there is a limitation in that it is a study with a strong bureaucratic and sociological context. I wrote this paper from the perspective that it could bring about an profer agenda for the full time prison chaplin introduction because approach through empirical opinion surveys of private prison staffs as other stake holders enables a balanced approach by supplementing the bureaucratic limitations of research targeting only state prison bureaucrats. Therefore, after examining the ideology and status of prison religious educational penalty and the necessity of full time prison chaplin, I empirically examined the effectiveness of the introduction method of the full time prison chaplin, etc through private prison staff as one of the empirical studies for the introduction of full-time prison chaplin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".