Combining Intensive Rehabilitation With a Nonfunctional Isokinetic Strengthening Program in Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebral palsy is the most common brain injury in the pediatric population. Patients with cerebral palsy present different affectations such as decreased muscle strength, gait deviations, impaired proprioception, and spasticity. Isokinetic strengthening programs combined with intensive rehabilitation may improve muscle strength and therefore gait efficiency. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of an intensive rehabilitation combined with a nonfunctional isokinetic progressive strengthening program to an intensive rehabilitation alone on gait parameters and muscle strength in patients with cerebral palsy. Another goal of this study is to determine whether adding an isokinetic program to intensive rehabilitation is more effective than intensive rehabilitation alone at decreasing spasticity and improving joint position sense in patients with cerebral palsy. METHODS: A total of 30 adolescents with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy (Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I to III) will be randomized, by an independent researcher, into a 3-week intensive rehabilitation and isokinetic progressive strengthening group or an intensive rehabilitation control group. Gait parameters, muscle strength, spasticity, and knee joint position sense will be assessed. These variables will be evaluated at baseline (T0) and at the end of the intervention (T1). The intensive rehabilitation will consist of physiotherapy sessions twice a day and hydrotherapy and virtual reality gait training once a day. The isokinetic training group will have a total of 9 supervised isokinetic strength training sessions focusing on knee flexors and extensors with different execution speeds. RESULTS: The protocol has been accepted by the French National Ethics Committee in October 2022. The inclusion of patients will start in November 2022. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of intensive rehabilitation with an isokinetic program on knee flexors and extensors has not been studied yet. The findings of this study may determine if an isokinetic strength training program of knee flexors and extensors is beneficial for the improvement of gait parameters, muscle strength, spasticity, and joint position sense in adolescents with spastic diplegia. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/43221.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.032 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.018 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.059 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".