MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312925681 · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3222359

A Full-Wave Discontinuous Galerkin Time-Domain Finite Element Method for Electromagnetic Field Mode Analysis

2022· article· en· W4312925681 on OpenAlexafffund
Homa Arab, Desong Wang, Ke Wu, Steven Dufour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsFinite element methodElectromagnetic fieldComputational electromagneticsGalerkin methodTransmission-line matrix methodDiscontinuous Galerkin methodTime domainMode (computer interface)Field (mathematics)Computer sciencePhysicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accurate analysis and the characterization of guided-wave structures are important steps in the design of microwave and optical systems. A numerical methodology based on a three-dimensional discontinuous Galerkin time-domain (DGTD) finite element method is used to estimate the resonant frequencies of various structures in a single run, with several polychromatic sources (dipole, plane wave, etc). The proposed approach leads to simulations that are fast and accurate, this being the result of the local discretization strategy of the full-wave time-domain Maxwell’s equations on unstructured tetrahedral meshes that is easy to parallelize. The stability of the overall numerical scheme is obtained using an upwind numerical flux and an implicit second-order accurate time integration scheme. The numerical methodology is verified based on two problems with closed-form solutions. First, homogeneous and non-homogeneous waveguides are studied using the proposed methodology. The WR-284 waveguide is used, and cut-off frequencies of the first 7 modes are computed and compared with analytical solutions. Propagation characteristics of mode-selective transmission lines (MSTL) are then investigated. These MSTL simulation results are verified using measurement results of fabricated MSTL, microstrip, and RWG prototypes up to 110 GHz. Simulation results show the flexibility, the robustness, and the high accuracy of the proposed numerical strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207