MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spatial Variation of Soft Shell Clam Biochemical Health Status-Impacts on Age Pigments, Glucose and Melatonin Status

2022· article· en· W4312927957 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
F. Gagné, C. André, S. Turgeon, N. Ménard

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biological and Environmental Investigations · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFjordMelatoninEstuaryBiologyZoologyEcologyOceanographyEndocrinologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clams are sessile organisms feeding at the sediment/water interface making them particularly at risk to urban/anthropogenic pollution. The purpose of this study was therefore to examine the health impacts of wild clam populations at 2 harbors in the Saint-Lawrence Estuary and on site in Saguenay Fjord (Québec, Canada) a site known for Beluga whale high residency area. Health status was examined at tissue levels for selected metallic elements, oxidative stress, energy metabolism and circadian rhythms (serotonin and melatonin levels). The data revealed that clams collected at the fjord site (Beluga residency) were the most contaminated by Ag, Al, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu Fe, Mn, Hg, Ni Pb, and Zn. The clams were physiologically older (age related pigments) showed signs of oxidative stress (peroxidase activity and lipid peroxidation) at most of the polluted sites and were strongly correlated to most of the above elements/metals. There was an increase in glucose, esterase and ketone bodies indicative of lipid mobilization for energy. Moreover, glucose levels were significantly correlated with known hyperglycemic metals such as Cd and Pb. Based on melatonin to serotonin ratio, clams at the most polluted site in Saguenay fjord and one marina site had elevated ratio suggesting altered circadian rhythm and were seemingly out of phase to the normal tidal schedule in this area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Biological and Environmental InvestigationsSame topicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207