MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312939501 · doi:10.1145/3572867.3572881

Factoring non-monic polynomials represented by black boxes

2022· article· en· W4312939501 on OpenAlex
Tian Chen, Michael Monagan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM communications in computer algebra · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonic polynomialFactorizationFactoringSubroutineMathematicsSquare (algebra)MapleBlack boxPolynomialComputer scienceCombinatoricsAlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsProgramming languageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We aim to factor a sparse polynomial a ∈ Z[ x 1 , ···, x n ] represented by a black box. The authors have previously developed efficient sparse Hensel lifting algorithms for the monic and square-free case that outperforms the algorithm by Kaltofen and Trager in 1990. We complete this black box factorization problem for the non-monic case with a new algorithm that computes the factors of a using many non-monic bivariate Hensel lifts. Our algorithm handles all cases of input a ∈ Z[ x 1 , ···, x n ] including the non-square-free and the non-primitive cases. We have implemented the algorithm in Maple with all major subroutines coded in C for efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0110.013
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it