Directed Distance-Based Formation Control of Nonlinear Heterogeneous Agents in 3-D Space
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article studies distance-based formation control of a set of nonlinear multiagent systems over directed graphs. We propose a distributed, distance-based formation control scheme for a set of heterogeneous, nonlinear agents over a particular class of minimally, structurally persistent, directed graphs in a 3-D space, namely, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">directed trilateral Laman</i> graphs. The responsibility of controlling each directed edge is assigned to only one of the adjacent agents. The state-dependent Riccati equation is used to design the control method for nonlinear agents. Based on the mathematical induction and stability theory of cascade interconnected systems, we rigorously prove the asymptotic stability of the overall formation. A combination of signed area and volume constraints is used to prevent agents from converging to the flip-ambiguous frameworks in 3-D space. The proposed control law assures collision avoidance between the neighboring pairs of agents. Simulation results are provided to verify the theoretical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it