MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

State-of-Charge Prediction of Degrading Li-ion Batteries Using an Adaptive Machine Learning Approach

2022· article· en· W4313050519 on OpenAlexaff
Iman Babaeiyazdi, Afshin Rezaei‐Zare, Shahab Shokrzadeh

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState of chargeKrigingSupport vector machineRandom forestBattery (electricity)Computer scienceGaussian processGround-penetrating radarState of healthLinear regressionArtificial intelligencePower (physics)Machine learningGaussianRadarChemistryTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

State of charge (SOC) estimation of degrading batteries is important for battery energy storage systems (BESS) employed in power system applications and electric vehicles. This paper aims to propose a comparative analysis for data-driven models such as linear regression (LR), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), and Gaussian process regression (GPR) to estimate the battery SOC at various temperatures and loading levels considering the state of health (SOH) of the battery. The historical data in which the cells are degraded from SOH of 100% to 60% are employed to extract the correlated features with the SOC. The models are retrained and adaptively updated based on the new SOH and prepared to estimate the SOC at the current SOH. The results demonstrate that GPR and RF models have the best performance. The mean absolute error of less than 0.0223 and 0.0204 have been achieved for RF and GPR, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207