Hubungan Antara Harapan Dengan Quarter Life Crisis Pada Mahasiswa Yang Mengalami Toxic Relationship
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis is an emotional crisis experienced by individuals who are in the transition phase from adolescence to early adulthood (emerging adulthood). Students as individuals in their early adulthood need to have a solution in order to properly deal with this quarter life crisis period. Hope can reduce distress and foster a positive effect. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between hope and quarter life crisis in students who experience toxic relationships. The population in this study were students of the State Islamic University of Raden Intan Lampung. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling. The sample in this study amounted to 92 respondents. The measuring tools used are the quarter life crisis scale and the expectation scale. The analysis technique used is product moment correlation with the help of IBM SPSS ver 25 software for windows. The results showed that the majority of students were in the moderate category of quarter life crisis where women were higher than men. The expectation variable shows that the expectations that students have are mostly in the moderate category, both are in the same category. The results of the analysis show that expectations have a significant negative effect on the quarter life crisis (R= -0.431, R Square= 0.185, p 0.01), which means that the higher the expectation, the lower the quarter life crisis experienced. And conversely, the lower the expectation, the higher the quarter life crisis experienced. Judging from the value of R Square, the expectation has an effect of 18.5% on the quarter life crisis, and the other 81.5% is influenced by other variables outside the study.Key Word: Hope, Quarter Life Crisis, Toxic Relationship
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".