MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313063200 · doi:10.4103/2456-7787.361112

Day III: Saturday, March 25, 2023; 11.15 am Plumeria 1 (Exhibition Hall): Poster Presentation Display time: Day II, March 24, 2023 2.00 pm – Day III, March 25, 2023 1.00 pm: AB No: 82 Functional outcome with the application of Non-Invasive Cranial Stimulation on motor and cognitive domains in Individual with Parkinson�s Disease: Pre-Post Study Design

2022· article· en· W4313063200 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mridul Jyotsna, Narkeesh Arumugam, Divya Midha

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Society of Indian Physiotherapists · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentParkinson's diseaseRandomized controlled trialRating scalePhysical therapyMedicineCognitionPsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicineDiseaseCognitive impairmentPsychiatryDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disorder of dopaminergic cells in basal ganglion. The standard rehabilitation models like non-invasive cranial stimulation aims to optimizing motor and cognitive recovery and minimize functional limitations in individual with PD. The aim is to determine the effect of NIS in motor and cognitive domains in an individual with Parkinson’s disease. Participants: Single group of 4 participants within the age group of 45-75 years were prediagnosed with Parkinson’s disease with motor impairment (Hoehn and Yahr stage I-III) and cognitive impairment were included. Methods: The present study was the part of Randomized control trial (RCT) registered in CTRI no:26/55/IEC/PUP/2022. Institutional approval was taken by Punjabi University Patiala. In this, patients were intervened with rTMS over DLPFC for the period of 20 minutes for 15 days combined with conventional physiotherapy. Outcome assessment was done using MDS- UPDRS - Version-III, MOCA, DRS and PD-QOL. Post-intervention Assessment was done at Day 7th and Day15th. Results: Improvement was observed in all the outcome measures i.e Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), Movement Disorder Society Sponsored Revision of Unified Parkinson Disease(MD-UPDRS), Disability Rating Scale (DRS) across the span of 2 weeks in which for MD-UPDRS value of p=.002,(t=9.899), MOCA (p=.069)(t=2.777), DRS(p= .092)(t=2.449).rTMS emphasized in the present cases is an insight for enhancing motor recovery and improvement in cognitive functioning by stimulating targeting area. Conclusion: The present results demonstrated the beneficial effect of Repetitive Transcranial magnetic stimulation in DLPFC on motor functions of UL & LL and cognitive function of the patients. Implications: Non-Invasive Stimulation enhancing motor recovery and improvement in cognitive functioning by stimulating targeting area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Society of Indian PhysiotherapistsSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207