The Effect of Different Taping on Balance and Strength in an Older Adult with Ankle Osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Ankle Osteoarthritis represents an important limiter on different aspects of efficient functioning of the ankle joints. The purpose of this study was to examine if application of zinc white tape and Kinesiotape would have an immediate positive effect on balance and strength of an older adult with ankle osteoarthritis. Methods: A 44 year old male diagnosed with osteoarthritis in his right ankle was recruited. The participant was 5’10” tall and weighted 178 lbs. He performed the Single-Leg Jump-Landing Test (SLJLT), the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) and the Standing Heel Rise Test (SHRT) without tape, and then with Kinesio and white Zinc tape. The tests were implemented on different days to prevent fatigue. Results: The results revealed that in comparison to no-tape conditions, both taping approaches coincided with enhanced static and dynamic balance control, as inferred from the Single-Leg Jump-Landing Test (SLJLT) and Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) respectively. The differences in strength, based on Standing Heel Rise Test (SHRT), were also evident but their clinical relevance is unclear. Conclusion: Overall, the results showed that taping represents a potentially enhancing, and immediate aid for someone with ankle osteoarthritis. The differences between the two tapes, in line with previous literature, warrant further exploration. Nevertheless, from the clinical and practical standpoint it appears that the application of either tape may be beneficial when the individual may engage in exercise or even simple activities of daily living.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".