THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE DATING TO THE LAST QUARTER OF THE 17th - EARLY 18th CENTURIES FROM THE EXCAVATIONS OF THE NEW PRIKAZY BUILDINGS IN THE MOSCOW KREMLIN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье приводятся статистические данные об узко датированном керамическом комплексе Нового времени из раскопок Института археологии РАН, при которых был открыт фундамент фасада здания Новых Приказов (1675-1770 гг.). Комплекс демонстрирует хронологический срез в бытовании различной посуды, распространенной на рынке Москвы и использовавшейся в быту служителей Приказов. Своеобразна структура типов использовавшейся посуды, соотношение функциональных форм керамики (горшков, кувшинов и т. п.). Впервые встречена в Москве форма светлоглиняных кувшинов-корчаг. The paper provides statistical data on a narrowly dated ceramic assemblage dating to the modern era from excavations conducted by the Institute of Archaeology, RAS, that uncovered a foundation pit of the New Prikazy building facade (1675-1770). The assemblage demonstrates a chronological section in use of various vessels frequently found in the Moscow market and commonly used by the Prikazy officials. The typology of the vessels used and percentage shares of various functional forms of the vessels (pots, jars, etc.) is quite singular. Large earthenware ewers made from light clay have been found in Moscow for the first time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it