MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313131910 · doi:10.1161/atvb.42.suppl_1.111

Abstract 111: Multiparametric Circulating Cardiovascular Biomarkers Elucidate A Molecular Signature Of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Mortality And Identify Vascular Barrier Stabilizing Therapies

2022· article· en· W4313131910 on OpenAlexaff
Dakota Gustafson, Michelle Ngai, Ruilin Wu, Huayun Hou, Clara Erice, Michael D. Wilson, Kevin C. Kain, Kate Hanneman, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Jason E. Fish, Kathryn L. Howe

Bibliographic record

VenueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsThe Wilson CentreHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVascular permeabilityEndothelial activationVascular diseaseDiseaseInternal medicineEndothelial dysfunctionEndotheliumImmunologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Endothelial cell (EC) activation, endotheliitis, vascular permeability, and thrombosis have been observed in patients with severe COVID-19, indicating that the vasculature is affected during the acute stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It remains unknown whether circulating vascular markers are sufficient to predict clinical outcomes, unique to COVID-19 related pathology, and if vascular permeability can be therapeutically targeted. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a prospectively recruited longitudinal multicenter cohort study enrolling 241 patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. The prevalence of circulating inflammatory, cardiac, EC activation, and the entirety of the microRNA transcriptome was evaluated, and the prognostic value assessed using a Random Forest model machine learning approach. Ex vivo experiments were performed to assess EC permeability responses to patient plasma and to derive modulated gene regulatory networks from which rational therapeutic selection could be inferred. Results: Multiple inflammatory and EC activation biomarkers were associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients and in severity-matched SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. In contrast, dysregulation of particular microRNAs at presentation was specific for poor COVID-19-related outcomes and revealed disease-relevant pathways. Integrating datasets (i.e., clinical, protein, and microRNA) using a machine learning approach further enhanced clinical risk prediction for in-hospital mortality. Exposure of ECs to COVID-19 patient plasma resulted in severity-specific gene expression responses and EC barrier dysfunction. ECs treated with patient plasma showed increased vascular permeability, which was ameliorated by treatment with the vascular stabilizing molecules angiopoietin-1 mimetic or recombinant Slit2-N, but not nangibotide or dexamethasone. Conclusions: Integration of multi-omics data identified microRNA and vascular biomarkers prognostic of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients and revealed that vascular stabilizing therapies should be explored as a treatment for endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19, and other severe diseases where endothelial dysfunction has a central role in pathogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular BiologySame topicBiomarkers in Disease MechanismsFrench-language works237,207