MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313133136 · doi:10.1039/d2gc02169b

A review of biodegradable thermoplastic starches, their blends and composites: recent developments and opportunities for single-use plastic packaging alternatives

2022· review· en· W4313133136 on OpenAlexafffund
Aarsha Surendren, Amar K. Mohanty, Qiang Liu, Manjusri Misra

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Chemistry · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Guelph
FundersOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsFedDev OntarioNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Agri-Food Innovation AllianceOntario Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and TradeMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoRoyal Society of CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaRoyal SocietyUniversity of GuelphCanada Foundation for InnovationMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsPlasticizerThermoplasticStarchMaterials scienceComposite materialPlastic wastePolymer scienceBiodegradable plasticFood scienceChemistryWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review article effectively analyses the effect of multiple plasticizers, compatibilizers, and essential oils on plasticized starch in the preparation of thermoplastic starch-based biodegradable blends and composites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations243
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreen ChemistrySame topicNanocomposite Films for Food PackagingFrench-language works237,207