Nineteen Years of Successful Use of Austenitic Stainless-Steel Pipelines for Oilfield Water Services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The technology to cost effectively design, construct, operate, and maintain ASTM A269 TP316L/TP316 stainless-steel pipelines for oilfield saltwater service and freshwater service was developed between 2002 and 2004. The first installations were austenitic pipe installed within discontinued, corroded carbon steel pipelines. Primary goals were to identify a cost-effective solution for a pipe-in-pipe application. After 2004, free-standing austenitic pipeline were installed in trenches. It was determined that coils of 316L/316 tubing in lengths of 2000 meters (6500 feet) were cost effective and readily available as line pipe material to simplify the field installation and joining practices. It was also determined that internal coatings, external coatings, and cathodic protection (except for risers) were not required for corrosion protection. Highlights from the engineering assessments and the examination of 17 cut-out samples of in-service piping will be presented to demonstrate the suitability of 316L/316 for oilfield water applications. Boundary limitations for temperature, transported fluid composition, and soil composition were defined to ensure that corrosion and stress corrosion cracking would not occur. Mechanical design and joining methods and concepts were adopted from ASME B31.3 because existing pipeline codes (e.g. CSA Z662) did not, and currently do not address this material for oilfield pipelines. Between 2002 and 2010, 90 pipelines for freshwater service and 55 pipelines for saltwater service were installed. A review in 2021 indicated that none of the installed pipelines have experienced leaks or failures associated due to in-service degradation. Two leaks have occurred during this 19-year period; one leak was attributed to installation wear and one leak was attributed to poor installation of a mechanical fitting. Material suitability was also verified via examination of cut-out pipe/fitting samples, and the use of stainless-steel corrosion coupons for 13 years. A comparison to other materials of construction indicates that the 316L/316 pipelines performed better. This case history will address the successful design, construction, operation, and maintenance of austenitic stainless-steel pipelines during the 2002 to 2021 period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".