MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Role of pericytes in the development of late-onset posttraumatic seizure.

2022· article· en· W4313198376 on OpenAlexaff
Fuyuko Takata, Kenta Sakai, Shinya Dohgu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings for Annual Meeting of The Japanese Pharmacological Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyPsychologyNeuroscienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can cause the development of posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) characterized by delayed onset. Increased convulsion risk persists for a long period, from a few months to several years after TBI. The late-onset PTE is often pharmacoresistant and occurs after an unpredictable latency. Thus, the latent period from TBI to the occurrence of the first unprovoked seizure may offer a window of opportunity for preventing the late-onset PTE. To clarify TBI pathology leading to the late-onset PTE, we observed changes of each cell type constituting neurovascular unit (NVU) in mice subjected to controlled cortical impact (CCI), which is an experimental traumatic brain injury at postoperative day 0-28. CCI mice showed that increased PDGFRβ expression in pericytes precedes increased Iba1 and GFAP expression in glial cells and neuronal hyperexcitability indicated by pilocarpine-induced convulsive behavior. Treatment with an inhibitor of PDGFRβ in the early phase after CCI suppressed microglial activation and neuronal hyperexcitability at postoperative day 28. Our results indicate that TBI-induced activation of pericytes characterized by increased PDGFRβ expression may drive the development of dysregulated NVU coordination including glial activation and neuronal hyperexcitability after TBI leading to the onset of PTE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings for Annual Meeting of The Japanese Pharmacological SocietySame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207