MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313198625 · doi:10.14740/wjon1539

Glycine Decarboxylase Suppresses the Renal Cell Carcinoma Growth and Regulates Its Gene Expressions and Functions

2022· article· en· W4313198625 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ye Da Chen, Ke Gao, Zhu Wang, Qiong Deng, Yu Ting Chen, Hui Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPolyamine Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRenal cell carcinomaGlycineCancer researchGeneCell growthOncologyInternal medicineCell biologyBiochemistryBiologyAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Glycine decarboxylase (GLDC), a key metabolic enzyme, participates in the regulation of the glycine metabolic pathway. Differential expression of GLDC is linked to the malignant growth of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and may regulate tumor progression through other genes. However, the regulatory function of GLDC in RCC is currently unknown. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the roles of GLDC in the invasion, proliferation, and migration of RCC cells and elucidate the processes underlying RCC development. Methods: The expression of GLDC in RCC cell lines and tissues was identified by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and western blot. A stably transfected cell line overexpressing GLDC was constructed using a lentiviral vector. Cell proliferation was detected using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) and EdU experiments, and scratch and transwell assays were used to determine migration and invasion capabilities. Furthermore, differential proteins were identified and obtained using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis. Finally, these differential proteins were analyzed by bioinformatics, including cluster analysis, subcellular localization, domain annotation, annotation of the Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), enrichment analysis, and study of protein-protein interactions. Results: GLDC expression was found to be lower in six RCC cell lines (786-O, A498, Caki-1, 769-P, OSRC-2, and ACHN) than in 293T cells and decreased in kidney cancer tissues compared to neighboring normal tissues. Overexpression of GLDC inhibited the proliferation of RCC cells as well as their migration and invasion abilities. Tandem mass tag analysis showed that 317 and 236 genes were downregulated and upregulated, respectively, when GLDC was overexpressed in A498 cells. Tandem mass tag analysis showed that 317 and 236 genes were downregulated and upregulated, respectively, when GLDC was overexpressed in A498 cells. Volcano plot showed these upregulated and downregulated proteins. Cluster analysis showed that differentially expressed protein screening can represent the effect of biological treatment on samples. Subcellular localization analysis showed differential proteins are mainly distributed in the nucleus, cytoplasm, mitochondria, plasma membrane, extracellular matrix, and lysosome. GO annotation showed many biological processes in the cells were changed, including "positive regulation of histone H3-K4 methylation", "cofactor binding", and "nuclear body". KEGG pathway analysis showed key pathways have all undergone considerable alterations, such as "cell cycle", "glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism", and "threonine, glycine, and serine metabolism". Finally, highly aggregated proteins with the same or similar functions were acquired by analysis of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Conclusions: These studies indicate that GLDC overexpression suppresses the invasion, proliferation, and migration of RCC cells and leads to the upregulation and downregulation of 236 and 317 genes, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of OncologySame topicPolyamine Metabolism and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207