MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313219901 · doi:10.1016/j.cpccr.2022.100215

Oxidative-stress induced pulmonary toxicity in a 46-year-old male with G6PD deficiency on chemotherapy

2022· article· en· W4313219901 on OpenAlexaff
Scott Strum, Michael Mitchell, Hooman Ganjavi, Mark Vincent

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Problems in Cancer Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph's HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemotherapyPulmonary toxicityFOLFOXPneumonitisOxaliplatinInternal medicineNeutropeniaToxicityLungCancerColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presented herein is the case report of a 46-year-old male with underlying G6PD deficiency who experienced dyspnea, radiographic pulmonary infiltrates, and unexplained tachycardia while on both FOLFOX chemotherapy and febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with G-CSF support. The proposed mechanism of illness was oxidativestress induced pulmonary toxicity mediated by oxaliplatin, G-CSF, and his underlying G6PD deficiency. He was treated through stopping all active chemotherapy agents and initiating oral steroids and nebulized N-acetylcystine. Within five weeks his symptoms had significantly improved, including a near-complete resolution of pulmonary infiltrates. This case report serves to review a general approach to drug-induced pneumonitis, and concurrently highlights the clinical significance of G6PD deficiency in routine patient care. In an increasingly global population, G6PD deficiency should be screened for in at-risk populations to optimize patient outcomes, including cancer patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Problems in Cancer Case ReportsSame topicNeonatal Health and BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207