MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

961: IMMUNOCOMPROMISE-ASSOCIATED PEDIATRIC ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME (IPARDS): A NEW PHENOTYPE

2022· article· en· W4313220680 on OpenAlexaff
Shira J. Gertz, Anoopindar Bhalla, Ranjit S. Chima, Guillaume Émériaud, Julie C. Fitzgerald, Deyin D. Hsing, Asumthia Jeyapalan, Colin J. Sallee, Neal J. Thomas, Nadir Yehya, Courtney M. Rowan

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineAcute respiratory distressMann–Whitney U testLogistic regressionCohortGastroenterologyLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Children with immunocompromising conditions (ICC) have a higher risk of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) and worse outcomes as compared to children without ICC. The degree to which ICC impacts PARDS presentation and prognosis has not been quantified. We hypothesize that this unique phenotype, IPARDS, warrants its own classification. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the PARDIE study. PARDIE occurred in 145 PICUs in 27 countries during 10 weeks from 5/2016 to 6/2017. ICC was defined in a yes/no format. Wilcoxon rank sum test, logistic and linear regression, and mixed effects longitudinal analysis were used to compare groups. Results: Of 708 subjects in the cohort, 105 had an ICC. Prior to PARDS diagnosis they were more often hospitalized (70% vs 35%, p< 0.001), more likely to meet at-risk for PARDS criteria (p=0.046), and spent more hours at-risk for PARDS (20 (IQR:8-46) vs 11 (IQR:4-34), (p=0.002)). Initial IPARDS severity was bimodal with more noninvasive (38% vs 20%) and more severe PARDS (32% vs 23%) than those without ICC p< 0.001. Additionally, oxygenation indices were higher at diagnosis and had less improvement over the 1st 3 days of PARDS (p< 0.001). They had higher PELOD2 over the first 3 days of PARDS (all p< 0.05) and more markers of nonpulmonary organ dysfunction including use of blood products, dialysis, diuretics, vasoactives, parental nutrition and insulin (all p< 0.05). Adjusting for initial oxygenation index and PRISM IV, IPARDS had a higher PICU mortality (44% vs 12% OR:4.7 (95% CI:2.4, 8.9) p< 0.001), fewer median ventilator free days at 28 days (0 vs 21, β-5.3 (95%CI: -7.9,-2.8) p< 0.001), and were more likely to die with multiorgan failure (OR: 7.9 (95%CI: 3.7, 16.7) p< 0.001) and refractory shock (OR: 5.7 (95% 1.9, 17.3) p=0.002). Conclusions: This study characterizes IPARDS, a novel phenotype which includes: hospitalization prior to PARDS diagnosis, longer time spent at-risk for PARDS, worse oxygenation, more non-pulmonary organ dysfunction, increased mortality across all severity groups, and more death from refractory shock and multiorgan dysfunction. Future investigations should work to confirm these characteristics of IPARDS, determine mechanisms underlying the increased severity, and develop targeted therapies to improve overall outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care Medicine→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→