Wide-Speed Range Sensorless Control of Five-Phase PMSM Drive under Healthy and Open Phase Fault Conditions for Aerospace Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a speed sensorless control of a five-phase PMSM in healthy operation and under the Open-Phase Fault on any phase of the machine. The solution is recommended for mission-critical applications requiring high reliability capacities, such as Aerospace applications. An adapted Active Fault Tolerant Control is proposed with the aim of obtaining electromechanical torque as close as possible to that normally developed by a machine working in healthy condition. In instances of a loss of power to one phase of the machine, a reconfiguration of the control law is performed to ensure the continuity of service and to maintain acceptable control performances without requiring a hardware rearrangement of the power architecture. The motor rotation speed and position, required for the Field Oriented Control (FOC) of the stator currents, are estimated using a Back-Electromotive Forces (Back-EMF) observer based on a mathematical model of the motor and implemented in the stator diphase reference frame. Different electrical models that describe the behavior of the five-phase machine in the normal and degraded operations are given. Experimental results on a 1.25 kW synchronous PM machine are shown to confirm the effectiveness of the motor control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".