Clay-Catalyzed Ozonation of Organic Pollutants in Water and Toxicity on Lemna minor: Effects of Molecular Structure and Interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of clays as adsorbents and catalysts in the ozonation of organic pollutants (Atrazine, bis-Phenol A, Diazinon, and Diclofenac sodium) allowed simulating their natural oxidative degradation in clay soils and to evaluate the ecotoxicity of mixtures partially oxidized on the species Lemna minor, a biodiversity representative of plants in the aquatic environment. Kinetic data showed that the adsorption of organic pollutants on clay particles obeys the pseudo-second-order model, while the adsorption isotherms satisfactorily fit the Langmuir model. Adsorption reduces the dispersion of the organic pollutant in the environment and prolongs its persistence and its natural degradation probability. Measurements of the Zeta potential and particle size as a function of pH demonstrate that the catalytic activity of clay depends on its cation, its silica/alumina ratio, and therefore on its permanent and temporary ion exchange capacities. These factors seem to govern its delamination and dispersion in aqueous media, its hydrophilic-hydrophobic character, and its porosity. Tests conducted on Lemna minor in contact with ozonation mixtures revealed that the toxicity could be due to pH decrease and to the toxicity of the intermediates yielded. Ecotoxicity would depend on the structure of the organic molecules, the chemical composition of the clay surface and ozonation time, which determines the oxidation progress. These results are of great importance for further research because they allow concluding that the negative impact of the persistence of an organic molecule in clay-containing media depends on the type and composition of the very clay mineral.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".