MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313246864 · doi:10.3390/atmos14010045

Atmospheric Effects of Magnetosheath Jets

2022· article· en· W4313246864 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmosphere · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanCanadian Space AgencyNational Central UniversityUniversity of AlbertaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsMagnetosheathPhysicsIonosphereMagnetosphereMagnetopauseAtmospheric sciencesIonizationGeophysicsAstrophysicsAtmosphere (unit)Earth's magnetic fieldAmplitudeElectron precipitationPlasmaIonMagnetic fieldMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report effects in the upper high-latitude atmosphere related to the interaction of fast magnetosheath plasma streams, so-called jets, with the dayside magnetopause. The jets were observed by THEMIS mission in the dayside magnetosphere during a quiet day on 12 July 2009. It was found that the jet interaction was accompanied by strong localized compression and penetration of suprathermal magnetosheath plasma inside the dayside magnetosphere. The compression caused prominent magnetic variations with amplitudes up to 100 nT observed by ground-based magnetic networks SuperMAG and CARISMA. The magnetic variations were also visible in the geomagnetic Dst and AE indices. The jets also resulted in intense precipitation of the suprathermal ions with energies < 10 keV and energetic electrons with energies > 30 keV observed by low-altitude NOAA/POES satellites in a wide longitudinal range. The precipitations produced enhancements of ionization with an amplitude of ~1 TECU (~30% in relative units) and intensification of the ionospheric E and F1 layers as observed in the FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC misson. The enhanced ionization in the upper atmosphere might affect radio communication and navigation in the high-latitude regions. These results also provide new insight into the contribution of magnetospheric forcing to day-to-day ionospheric variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it