<i>Aromas of knowledge, networks of scent</i>: tracing the olfactory imagination of a 17th-century Ottoman traveler
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACTStanding in as a monumental work of Ottoman first-person prose that is without precedent, the Seyāḥatnāme ("Book of Travels"), at once a travelogue as well as a literary composition, is an ideal source for conducting a sensate history of Ottoman-Islamic society in the 17th century. Using characteristic flair and imagination, its author Evliyā Çelebi relates a number of fantastical anecdotes where scent plays a key narrative purpose, once in the context of conversing with the sacred dead in a dream, and on three occasions during visits to the caves of various Islamicate religious figures from the past. This paper will analyze these anecdotes to determine the narrative functions of scent in the text and in doing so tease out how olfaction was implicated in the Ottoman religious and social imaginary.KEYWORDS: Early modernOttomanEvliyā ÇelebiSeyahatnameolfactionsmellstravel literaturedreams AcknowledgmentsI would like to express my gratitude to the editors and reviewers at The Senses and Society for their instructive feedback on this article. My gratitude also goes to mentors and colleagues who provided useful feedback on early iterations of this work, namely; Hakan Karateke and the late Frank Lewis at the University of Chicago, as well as to the participants of the Graduate History Symposium: Senses and Spaces, held at the University of Toronto in May 2018.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict was reported by the author.Notes1. My definition of osmologies is based upon that of Constance Classen, David Howes, and Anthony Synnott, i.e. "classificatory systems based on smell, which are used to order the world", and I take as a given the further assertion that they often form part of a larger cosmology, or "body of ideas concerning how the universe is ordered". See; p.95 and p.116–118.2. The ten companions of Muḥammad who had been promised heaven in his lifetime.3. For more on the socio-political import of Baraka in symbiotic political relationships between rulers and ṣūfīs in the Seljuk era see; Chapter 5 "Bargaining with Baraka" in Omid Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam: Negotiating Ideology and Religious Inquiry (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006). For more on the role of the body in the transfer of baraka see the introduction to Shahzad Bashir, Sufi Bodies: Religion and Society in Medieval Islam, (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013), and Michael Muhammad Knight, Muhammad's Body: Baraka Networks and the Prophetic Assemblage, (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2020).Additional informationNotes on contributorsRao Mohsin Ali NoorRao Mohsin Ali Noor is Assistant Professor of Early Modern Ottoman History at Johns Hopkins University. He can be reached at rnoor3@jh.edu
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".