MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313251526 · doi:10.1080/17458927.2022.2157970

<i>Aromas of knowledge, networks of scent</i>: tracing the olfactory imagination of a 17th-century Ottoman traveler

2022· article· en· W4313251526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rao Mohsin Ali Noor

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Senses and Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGratitudeNarrativeContext (archaeology)DreamHistorySociologyLiteratureAestheticsPsychologyArtSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTStanding in as a monumental work of Ottoman first-person prose that is without precedent, the Seyāḥatnāme ("Book of Travels"), at once a travelogue as well as a literary composition, is an ideal source for conducting a sensate history of Ottoman-Islamic society in the 17th century. Using characteristic flair and imagination, its author Evliyā Çelebi relates a number of fantastical anecdotes where scent plays a key narrative purpose, once in the context of conversing with the sacred dead in a dream, and on three occasions during visits to the caves of various Islamicate religious figures from the past. This paper will analyze these anecdotes to determine the narrative functions of scent in the text and in doing so tease out how olfaction was implicated in the Ottoman religious and social imaginary.KEYWORDS: Early modernOttomanEvliyā ÇelebiSeyahatnameolfactionsmellstravel literaturedreams AcknowledgmentsI would like to express my gratitude to the editors and reviewers at The Senses and Society for their instructive feedback on this article. My gratitude also goes to mentors and colleagues who provided useful feedback on early iterations of this work, namely; Hakan Karateke and the late Frank Lewis at the University of Chicago, as well as to the participants of the Graduate History Symposium: Senses and Spaces, held at the University of Toronto in May 2018.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict was reported by the author.Notes1. My definition of osmologies is based upon that of Constance Classen, David Howes, and Anthony Synnott, i.e. "classificatory systems based on smell, which are used to order the world", and I take as a given the further assertion that they often form part of a larger cosmology, or "body of ideas concerning how the universe is ordered". See; p.95 and p.116–118.2. The ten companions of Muḥammad who had been promised heaven in his lifetime.3. For more on the socio-political import of Baraka in symbiotic political relationships between rulers and ṣūfīs in the Seljuk era see; Chapter 5 "Bargaining with Baraka" in Omid Safi, The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam: Negotiating Ideology and Religious Inquiry (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006). For more on the role of the body in the transfer of baraka see the introduction to Shahzad Bashir, Sufi Bodies: Religion and Society in Medieval Islam, (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013), and Michael Muhammad Knight, Muhammad's Body: Baraka Networks and the Prophetic Assemblage, (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2020).Additional informationNotes on contributorsRao Mohsin Ali NoorRao Mohsin Ali Noor is Assistant Professor of Early Modern Ottoman History at Johns Hopkins University. He can be reached at rnoor3@jh.edu

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Senses and SocietySame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207