MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313263239 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3684

Radial velocity confirmation of a hot super-Neptune discovered by TESS with a warm Saturn–mass companion

2022· article· en· W4313263239 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Emil Knudstrup, D. Gandolfi, G. Nowak, C. M. Persson, Elise Furlan, John H. Livingston, Elisabeth C. Matthews, M. Lundkvist, Mark Lykke Winther, Jakob Rørsted Mosumgaard, Simon Albrecht, Elisa Goffo, I. Carleo, H. J. Deeg, Karen A. Collins, Norio Narita, Howard Isaacson, Seth Redfield, F. Dai, Teruyuki Hirano, Joseph M. Akana Murphy, Corey Beard, Lars A. Buchhave, Savannah Cary, Ashley Chontos, Ian J. M. Crossfield, William D. Cochran, Dennis M. Conti, Paul A. Dalba, M. Esposito, S. B. Fajardo‐Acosta, Steven Giacalone, Samuel K. Grunblatt, P. Guerra, A. P. Hatzes, Rae Holcomb, Ferran Grau Horta, Andrew W. Howard, Daniel Huber, Jon M. Jenkins, P. Kábath, Stephen R. Kane, J. Korth, K. W. F. Lam, Kathryn V. Lester, Rachel A. Matson, Kim K. McLeod, J. Orell-Miquel, F. Murgas, Ε. Πάλλη, Alex S. Polanski, G. Ricker, Paul Robertson, Ryan A. Rubenzahl, Joshua E. Schlieder, Sara Seager, A. M. S. Smith, Peter Tenenbaum, Emma V. Turtelboom, R. Vanderspek, Lauren M. Weiss, Joshua N. Winn

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloNational Research Council CanadaStockholms UniversitetUniversitetet i OsloNational Institutes of Natural SciencesNuclear Safety and Security CommissionHáskóli ÍslandsIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningSwedish National Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationStellar Astrophysics CentreDanmarks GrundforskningsfondJapan Science and Technology CorporationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Research FoundationNew York Community TrustFund for Astrophysical ResearchCalifornia Institute of TechnologyTurun YliopistoAarhus UniversitetAmes Research CenterW. M. Keck FoundationEuropean Space AgencyAlfred P. Sloan FoundationDanmarks Frie ForskningsfondNational Science FoundationMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e ComunicaçõesKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteVillum Fonden
KeywordsPhysicsNeptuneRadial velocitySaturnAstronomyAstrophysicsPlanetAstrobiologyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We report the discovery and confirmation of the planetary system TOI-1288. This late G dwarf harbours two planets: TOI-1288 b and TOI-1288 c. We combine TESS space-borne and ground-based transit photometry with HARPS-N and HIRES high-precision Doppler measurements, which we use to constrain the masses of both planets in the system and the radius of planet b. TOI-1288 b has a period of $2.699835^{+0.000004}_{-0.000003}$ d, a radius of 5.24 ± 0.09 R⊕, and a mass of 42 ± 3 M⊕, making this planet a hot transiting super-Neptune situated right in the Neptunian desert. This desert refers to a paucity of Neptune-sized planets on short period orbits. Our 2.4-yr-long Doppler monitoring of TOI-1288 revealed the presence of a Saturn–mass planet on a moderately eccentric orbit ($0.13^{+0.07}_{-0.09}$) with a minimum mass of 84 ± 7 M⊕ and a period of $443^{+11}_{-13}$ d. The five sectors worth of TESS data do not cover our expected mid-transit time for TOI-1288 c, and we do not detect a transit for this planet in these sectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207