"THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES TO NOCTURNAL BRUXISM – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction. Le bruxisme est un terme qui dfinit le frottement ou "grincement" des dents. Elle touche une grande partie de la population. Le diagnostic prcoce du bruxisme est d'une grande importance pour son traitement et sa prvention. L'objectif de l'tude tait de raliser une revue systmatique des approches thrapeutiques du bruxisme nocturne, incluant uniquement les essais cliniques contrls randomiss publis dans la littrature scientifique. Matriaux et mthodes. Nous avons analys les donnes des trois bases de donnes suivantes : PubMed, ScienceDirect et Google Scholar. Le programme EndNote a t utilis pour achever la slection des articles et simplifier la collecte des rfrences bibliographiques la Vancouver. Neuf tudes remplissaient les critres d'inclusion et d'exclusion et ont t analyses plus en dtail. La collecte des donnes a t effectue en dveloppant une base de donnes dans Microsoft ABSTRACT Introduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".