Ekspresowa Analiza Zagrożenia Agrofagiem: Seiridium cardinale (W.W. Wagener) B. Sutton & I.A.S. Gibson
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seiridium cardinale infests species in the Cupressaceae family, causing canker of cypresses. The main hosts of the agrophage are Cupressus lawsoniana, C. macrocarpa, C. sempervirens and Thuja occidentalis. The disease is manifested by yellowing or reddening of the leaves, which with time dry up and fall to the ground. The branches and tops of the trees die back. If there is a spread of infection in several places on one tree, it can lead to the death of the plant in a relatively short period of time depending on its age, susceptibility and environment. On the branches, at the point of penetration of the pathogen, a slight depression, a longitudinal crack and lenticular or elongated cankers with resinous exudate appear, sometimes there is necrosis of the bark. The pathogen appeared in 1927 in California, then spread to Canada, New Zealand, Asia Minor, South Africa and Europe. S. cardinale caused huge losses in the middle of the last century in France and Italy, and its presence was also confirmed in Germany. Due to the widespread occurrence of several host plants in the PRA area and changing climatic conditions, there is a risk of the agrophyte appearing in Poland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".