Characterization of the contactin 5 protein and its risk‐associated polymorphic variant throughout the Alzheimer's disease spectrum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We investigate the CNTN5 rs1461684 G variant and the contactin 5 protein in sporadic Alzheimer's disease (sAD). METHODS: Contactin 5, sAD biomarkers, and synaptic markers were measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Amyloid and tau deposition were assessed using positron emission tomography. Contactin 5 protein and mRNA levels were measured in brain tissue. RESULTS: CSF contactin 5 increases progressively in cognitively unimpaired individuals and is decreased in mild cognitive impairment and sAD. CSF contactin 5 correlates with sAD biomarkers and with synaptic markers. The rs1461684 G variant associates with faster disease progression in cognitively unimpaired subjects. Cortical full-length and isoform 3 CNTN5 mRNAs are decreased in the presence of the G allele and as a function of Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease stages. DISCUSSION: The newly identified rs1461684 G variant associates with sAD risk, rate of disease progression, and gene expression. Contactin 5 protein and mRNA are affected particularly in the early stages of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".