MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313309314 · doi:10.1101/2022.12.14.22283419

Using Social Media to Help Understand Long COVID Patient Reported Health Outcomes: A Natural Language Processing Approach

2022· preprint· en· W4313309314 on OpenAlexaff
Elham Dolatabadi, Diana Moyano, Michael Bales, Sofija Spasojević, Rohan Bhambhoria, Junaid A. Bhatti, Shyamolima Debnath, Nicholas Hoell, Xin Li, Celine Leng, Sasha Nanda, Jad Saab, Esmat Sahak, Fanny Sie, Sara Uppal, Nirma Khatri Vadlamudi, Antoaneta Vladimirova, Artur Yakimovich, Xiaoxue Yang, Sedef Akinli Koçak, Angela M. Cheung

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory and Cough-Related Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTelus (Canada)Queen's UniversityRoche (Canada)Vector InstituteUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial mediaAnxietyHeadachesMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DistressPsychologyDiseasePsychiatryClinical psychologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Computer sciencePathologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background There remains significant uncertainty in the definition of the long COVID disease, its expected clinical course, and its impact on daily functioning. Social media platforms can generate valuable insights into patient-reported health outcomes as the content is produced at high resolution by patients and caregivers, representing experiences that may be unavailable to most clinicians. Objective We aim to determine the validity and effectiveness of advanced NLP approaches built to derive insight into Long COVID-related patient-reported health outcomes from social media platforms. Methodology We use Transformer-based BERT models to extract and normalize long COVID Symptoms and Conditions (SyCo) from English posts on Twitter and Reddit. Furthermore, we estimate the occurrence and co-occurrence of SyCo terms at any point or across time and locations. Finally, we compare the extracted health outcomes with human annotations and highly utilized clinical outcomes grounded in the medical literature. Result Based on our findings, the top three most commonly occurring groups of long COVID symptoms are systemic (such as “fatigue”), neuropsychiatric (such as “anxiety” and “brain fog”), and respiratory (such as “shortness of breath”). Regarding the co-occurring symptoms, the pair of ‘fatigue & headaches’ is most common. In addition, we show that other conditions, such as infection, hair loss, and weight loss, as well as mentions of other diseases, such as flu, cancer, or Lyme disease, are among the top reported terms by social media users. Conclusion The outcome of our social media-derived pipeline is comparable with the outcomes of peer-reviewed articles relevant to long COVID symptoms. Overall, this study provides unique insights into patient-reported health outcomes from long COVID and valuable information about the patient’s journey that can help healthcare providers anticipate future needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchFrench-language works237,207