Noninvasive testing for mycophenolate exposure in children with renal transplant using urinary metabolomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the common use of mycophenolate in pediatric renal transplantation, lack of effective therapeuic drug monitoring increases uncertainty over optimal drug exposure and risk for adverse reactions. This study aims to develop a novel urine test to estimate MPA exposure based using metabolomics. METHODS: Urine samples obtained on the same day of MPA pharmacokinetic testing from two prospective cohorts of pediatric kidney transplant recipients were assayed for 133 unique metabolites by mass spectrometry. Partial least squares (PLS) discriminate analysis was used to develop a top 10 urinary metabolite classifier that estimates MPA exposure. An independent cohort was used to test pharmacodynamic validity for allograft inflammation (urinary CXCL10 levels) and eGFR ratio (12mo/1mo eGFR) at 1 year. RESULTS: Fifty-two urine samples from separate children (36.5% female, 12.0 ± 5.3 years at transplant) were evaluated at 1.6 ± 2.5 years post-transplant. Using all detected metabolites (n = 90), the classifier exhibited strong association with MPA AUC by principal component regression (r = 0.56, p < .001) and PLS (r = 0.75, p < .001). A practical classifier (top 10 metabolites; r = 0.64, p < .001) retained similar accuracy after cross-validation (LOOCV; r = 0.52, p < .001). When applied to an independent cohort (n = 97 patients, 1053 samples), estimated mean MPA exposure over Year 1 was inversely associated with mean urinary CXCL10:Cr (r = -0.28, 95% CI -0.45, -0.08) and exhibited a trend for association with eGFR ratio (r = 0.35, p = .07), over the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: This urinary metabolite classifier can estimate MPA exposure and correlates with allograft inflammation. Future studies with larger samples are required to validate and evaluate its clinical application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".