MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Thy-1 signaling in murine T cells promotes cytokine polarization (90.20)

2009· article· en· W4313348217 on OpenAlexaff
Suzanne J. Furlong, David W. Hoskin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytokineCell biologyT-cell receptorT cellBiologySignal transductionImmune systemMonoclonal antibodyT lymphocyteImmunologyMolecular biologyChemistryAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins (GPI-AP) that provide activating signals to T cells have been implicated in T cell-mediated immune responses. The effect of GPI-AP signaling on cytokine production and the development of effector T lymphocyte phenotypes remains unclear. In this study, highly pure resting T cells were stimulated with either anti-Thy-1 or anti-TcR monoclonal antibody (mAb) along with costimulatory signals provided by LPS-matured dendritic cells. At concentrations of mAb that induced optimal proliferation, Thy-1-activated T cells proliferated ~2-fold less than TcR-activated T cells. Analysis of cytokine production using cytokine arrays and ELISA showed that Thy-1 signaling induced significantly less IL-2 and IFN-γ synthesis than TcR signaling. Interestingly, Thy-1-stimulated T cells produced significantly more IL-17 and IL-4 than TcR-stimulated T cells. Cytokine polarization was unique to Thy-1, as T cells stimulated with mAb against the GPI-AP Ly6A/E did not produce appreciable levels of IL-17 or IL-4. These results support previous reports that Thy-1 signaling differs from TcR signaling and suggest that Thy-1 may provide polarizing signals that promote the development of Th17 and Th2 cells. Thy-1 and other GPI-AP proteins require further study to elucidate their possible roles in influencing the nature of T cell-mediated immune responses. Research was funded by NSERC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicPharmacological Effects of Natural CompoundsFrench-language works237,207