MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

LTβR signaling in Dendritic Cells induces a Type I IFN response that is required for optimal clonal expansion of CD8+ T cells (100.40)

2011· article· en· W4313350093 on OpenAlexaff
Dennis Ng, Leslie Summers deLuca, Yunfei Gao, Michael E. Wortzman, Tania H. Watts, Jennifer L. Gommerman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyCytotoxic T cellCD8T cellBiologyCD40Antigen-presenting cellImmune systemImmunologyAntigen presentationLymphotoxinAntigenDendritic cellIL-2 receptorIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract During an acute infection, dendritic cells (DC) are triggered by pattern recognition receptors (PRR) to produce inflammatory molecules that are important for the expansion and function of CD8+ T lymphocytes in order to clear the infection. In contrast, tumours or autoimmune responses against tissue antigens produce very little inflammation, yet the immune response can proceed in the absence of obvious PRR activation. In these situations, DC require CD4+ T cell help to initiate CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity. Here we generated mixed chimeric mice lacking Lymphotoxin-β receptor (LTβR) specifically on the DC, and we found that they exhibit reduced CD8+ T cell expansion in a help-dependent response. In contrast, inhibition of the CD40 signaling only impaired CD8+ T cell interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production. Furthermore, we have identified that LTβR signaling in DC triggers IFN-α/β expression in the absence of any PRR ligand and is critical for antigen specific CD8+ T cell expansion. Therefore, this study demonstrates that different TNF family members provide integrative signals that shape the licensing potential of antigen-presenting DC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→