MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SLP-76 Adaptor Binding to SUMO-RANGAP1 of the Nuclear Pore Complex Regulates Multiple Aspects of T-cell Immunity

2017· article· en· W4313360151 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher E. Rudd, Felix Jules

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyCytoplasmSignal transducing adaptor proteinNuclear transportNuclear poreT cellNuclear proteinBiologyCell nucleusSignal transductionImmune systemImmunologyTranscription factorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While immune cell adaptors regulate various proximal events in T cell signaling, the direct regulation of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) has not been reported. On the cytoplasmic side of the NPC, there are cytoplasmic filaments composed of two fundamental proteins RanGAP1 and RanBP2. We previously showed that the immune cell adaptor SLP-76 binds directly to SUMO-RanGAP1 of cytoplasmic fibrils of the NPC, and that this interaction is needed for optimal NFATc1 and NF-κB p65 nuclear entry in T cells (Liu et al., 2015 Mol Cell 59, 840–9). The use of a mutant form of SLP-76 that is unable to bind to RanGAP1 (i.e. K56E) reduced nuclear entry and T-cell cytokine production by >60%. It represents the second step in NFATc1 entry into the nucleus of T-cells following classic NFATc de-phosphorylation by calcineurin. We now show that K56E mutant reduced toll-like receptor induction of NF-κB nuclear entry (innate signaling) and that T-cells from K56E mutant mice show major defects in T-cell proliferation and immunity. Our findings further underscore the importance of this direct regulation of NPC function in T cell function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207