MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The role of NKT cells in systemic Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) infection

2019· article· en· W4313382894 on OpenAlexaff
Samantha Genardi, Cao Liang, Lavanya Visvabharathy, E. Berdyshev, Chyung‐Ru Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural killer T cellCD1DStaphylococcus aureusMicrobiologyImmunologyBiologyT cellImmune systemBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an extracellular pathogen responsible for many deaths in the hospital setting each year. The role of conventional T cells in MRSA infection has been extensively studied, however the role of CD1d-restricted natural killer T (NKT) cells in MRSA infection is unknown. NKT cells are divided into 2 subsets, type I expressing an invariant TCR, and type II NKT cells, expressing diverse TCR. Mice lacking both NKT cell subsets showed increased bacterial burdens, inflammatory foci, and neutrophilic infiltrates in the kidneys and increased bacterial burdens in the liver at early times post infection. Both type I and type II NKT cells are activated after SA infection and produce IFN-g. We identified polar lipid species from the cell membrane of MRSA that induce CD1d-dependent IFN-g production by type II NKT cells. We also demonstrate that type I NKT cells, together with neutrophils, control bacterial burdens in infected macrophages. Therefore, NKT cells can become activated and produce protective cytokines in response to MRSA infection that enhances control of infection prior to conventional T cell activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicImmune Cell Function and Interaction→French-language works237,207→