MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Early signalling changes in T cells with aging

2016· article· en· W4313385692 on OpenAlexaff
Tamás Fülöp, Aurélie Le Page, Gilles Dupuis, Anis Larbi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyPhosphorylationImmune systemBiologyPhenotypePhosphataseSignal transductionSignallingKinaseIntracellularCell signalingT cellImmunologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aging is accompanied by many physiological changes and the immune system is not escaping this. This effect of time is affecting most cells of the immune system. Numerous changes have been described but most of them are phenomenological, a typical example is the change of phenotypes in T cells. We are interested since years to uncover the intracellular signaling associated with phenotypic and functional changes of various immune cells. We identified several signaling alterations starting from the early to the most downstream events in several cells like neutrophils, monocytes and T lymphocytes. We not only were interested in the forward signaling driven by kinases but also by the feedback or regulatory signaling mediated by phosphatases. We found profound alterations of regulatory phosphatases activity and phosphorylation (e.g. SHP-1). The question was always whether these changes are occurring also uniformly in T cell or there are differences between the various subpopulations (naive to the continuum of memory T cells). Our studies indicate that there are changes according to the subpopulations and that basal hyper-phosphorylation status we observe may be explained by signaling crosstalks. We also observed that there is a resemblance between naïve and TEMRA T cells, which differ much from CM and RM cells. In conclusion the different T cell subpopulations may have very specific changes distinguishing them from each other. This needs further investigations in relation to their functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicT-cell and B-cell Immunology→French-language works237,207→