EL ROL DEL DEPORTE Y LOS VALORES DEL IDEARIO OLÍMPICO EN LA TRAYECTORIA DEPORTIVA DE ELOÍSA MARCOS QUINTANO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research work that supports this publication takes as its object of study to describe up to what extent Olympism and its ideology were present during the evolution of the sports and personal career of Eloísa Marcos Quintano, a Spanish gymnast in the 1960s and 1970s that took part in the Montreal 1976 Olympic Games. The methodology of this work has been structured based on the document analysis of the Olympic Charter (2020 edition) by extracting the values that the Olympic ideology manifests implicit in that document, once contrasted the parallelism of this ideology with the conceptual scheme of the functions that physical activity and sport can fulfill, as published by Professor Juan L. Hernández Álvarez in Hernández-Álvarez y Velázquez-Buendía (1996). Using as a base line the result of the added documentary analysis, it has been elaborated the structure of a script of a semi-structured open interview (Hammer and Wildasky, 1990) based on the athlete Eloísa Marcos, was elaborated as a primary oral source. The protagonist of the events that we intended to bring back to light. The testimonial data collected in the interview were also collected with other documentary sources, mainly hemerographic. As a result, the reflections and analyses of the role that sport played in Eloísa Marcos Quintano's career are presented based on the theoretical aspects that the Olympic Ideology intends to put in practice when it comes to its philosophy, as well as the analysis of what have been the functions that in its particular circumstance the sports activity has performed, among them the ones presented by Hernández-Álvarez y Velázquez-Buendía (1996).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".