MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313402931 · doi:10.1007/s00264-022-05656-y

New surgical techniques and social media in orthopaedics. Is a scientific peer-reviewed journal assimilated to a social media platform?

2022· editorial· en· W4313402931 on OpenAlex
Marius M. Scarlat, Andreas F. Mavrogenis, Philippe Hernigou, James P. Waddell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Orthopaedics · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media in Health Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial mediaOrthopedic surgeryMedicinePeer reviewMedical educationMedical physicsSurgeryWorld Wide WebComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New techniques and modifications of old procedures appear and disappear in the history of Orthopaedics and Medicine. A brief summary of the articles published in history sections and topical collections are useful to understand the linkages between past and present A brief review of a Journal published 20 or 30 years ago describes the trends and facts valid for that time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it