“Con arquitectura noble y suntuosa”. La fachada triunfal del palacio de la inquisición de Lisboa con motivo de los dobles matrimonios reales de 1785
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los lazos matrimoniales formados por las casas reales de Portugal y España en abril y junio de 1785 promovieron la unión entre D. João de Bragança y D. Carlota Joaquina de Borbón y D. Mariana Victoria de Bragança y D. Gabriel de Borbón. El Palacio de la Inquisición de Lisboa fue el epicentro de los festejos promovidos por el diplomático enviado en representación de la Corona española, el VI Conde de Fernán Núñez. La estructura de la fachada, concebida para las segundas festividades, revelaba una imaginería que representaba el poder de su promotor, según el proyecto y ejecución de Timothée Lécussan Verdier y Matthieu Doret.El enfoque propuesto se basa en el contexto histórico de los eventos festivos que conducen a la construcción de una estructura arquitectónica exterior monumental yuxtapuesta al edificio del Palacio de la Inquisición de Lisboa. Tras caracterizar la estructura arquitectónica y analizar el programa iconográfico de la efímera fachada, pretendemos justificar la atribución de los nombres de los dos principales artistas que intervinieron en su construcción y proceder a la identificación de posibles modelos de influencia artística.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".