EMDS: predicting essential miRNAs based on deep learning and sequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) as small 19- to 24-nucleotide noncoding RNAs play crucial roles in some key biological progress associated with human diseases. Therefore, identifying the essentiality of miRNAs is important to systematically understand the pathogenic mechanism of diseases. There are some computational methods have been developed to predict essential miRNAs because traditional biological experiments are both time- and labor-consuming. However, these computational methods only used the statistical feature and structural feature of miRNA sequences. The timing characteristics of sequences also should be considered to improve the prediction performance. In addition, the capability deep learning model is well-known. Therefore, in this study, we present a computational method (called EMDS) to predict essential miRNAs. EMDS takes not only the statistical and structural features of sequences but also the subsequence features based on the time characteristics of sequences and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). Furthermore, considering that the successful applications of attention mechanism and the subsequence in a miRNA sequence are important, we use a neural attention mechanism to obtain subsequence features of miRNAs. Finally, we integrate the statistical features and structural features, subsequence features as final miRNA features which is inputted into Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) to predict essential miRNAs. We evaluate the prediction performance of our method by the 5-fold cross validation. We also compare EMDS with other four competing methods which include PESM, miES, Gaussian Naive Bayes (Gaus_NB) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) by performing same cross validation experiments. The results show that EMDS achieves better prediction performance in terms of AUC (EMDS:0.9335, PESM:0.9117, miES:0.8837, Gaus_NB:0.8720, SVM:0.8571). It also illustrates that our method can effectively predict the essential miRNAs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".