MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313414806 · doi:10.3390/pr11010075

Feasibility Study of Applying Anaerobic Step-Feeding Mode for the Treatment of High-Strength Wastewater in Granular Sequencing Batch Reactors (GSBRs)

2022· article· en· W4313414806 on OpenAlex
Elsayed Mady, Jan A. Oleszkiewicz, Qiuyan Yuan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcesses · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSequencing batch reactorGranulationAnaerobic exerciseNutrientNitrateWastewaterNitrificationPulp and paper industryChemistryNitriteAmmoniumDenitrificationNitrogenEnvironmental engineeringMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceBiologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated the feasibility of applying an anaerobic step-feeding strategy to enhance the performance of granular sequencing batch reactors (GSBRs) in terms of operational stability of the cultivated mature granules and nutrient removal efficiencies. Two identical 5 L reactors were operated with a total cycle time of 8 h. GSBRs were operated with high-strength synthetic wastewater (COD = 1250 ± 43, ammonium (NH4-N) = 115.2 ± 4.6, and orthophosphate (PO4-P) = 17.02 ± 0.9 mg/L) for 360 days through three stages: (1) Cultivation, 125 days (>2.1 mm); (2) Maturation, 175 days (>3 mm); (3) alternate feed loading strategy for R2 only for 60 days (anaerobic step-feeding). The granulation process, the physical properties of the granules, the nutrients, and the substrate removal performance were recorded during the entire operational period. For the cultivation and maturation stages, both reactors followed the fast single feeding mode followed by anaerobic mixing, and the results indicated a strong correlation between R1 and R2 due to the same working conditions. During the cultivation stage, adopting high organic loading rate (OLR) at the reactor start-up did not accelerate the formation of granules. Removal efficiency of PO4-P was less than 76% during the maturation period, while it exceeded 90% for COD, and was higher than 80% for NH4-N without effect of nitrite or nitrate accumulations due to simultaneous nitrification–denitrification. After changing filling mode for R2 only, there was unexpected deterioration in the performance and a rapid disintegration of the matured granules (poor settleability) accompanied by poor effluent quality due to high content of suspended solids because of applying selection pressure of short settling time. Consequently, GSBRs operation under the effect of fast single feeding mode followed by anaerobic mixing favors stable long-term granule stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it