Kalıcı komplike yas bozukluğu tanılı hastalarda aleksitimi, psikolojik dayanıklılık ve psikiyatrik belirtilerin incelenmesi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to examine alexithymia, psychological resilience, and sychiatric symptoms in patients with persistent complex bereavement disorder.<br> Materials and Methods: A total of 62 participants were included in the study, 31 subjects diagnosed with PCBD and 31 healthy controls. Participants were administered the socio-demographic data form, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20).<br> Results: BAI (p<0.001), BDI (p<0.001), and TAS-20 (p<0.001) scale scores were found to be significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group. All sub-dimensions of the RSA scale total score were found to be significantly lower between both groups (p <0.001). The anxiety, depression, and lexithymia levels of the patients diagnosed with persistent complex bereavement disorder were significantly higher than the control group; psychological resilience levels were found to be significantly lower.<br> Conclusions: We believe that identifying this situation will shape the psychosocial support to be given to individuals in the pathological mourning process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.117 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".