Modelling internal tree attributes for breeding applications in Douglas-fir progeny trials using RPAS-ALS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) is one of the most commercially important softwood species in North America. In British Columbia, Canada, breeding has increased volume gains between 20 and 30%, while 97% of seedlings come from improved seed sources. Branching traits in particular, have a strong influence on strength and stiffness of Douglas-fir wood; however, they are rarely measured. Remotely Piloted Aerial Systems and Airborne Laser Scanning Systems (RPAS-LS) produce high-density three-dimensional point clouds that can be used for the creation of internal geometric features describing individual tree branching structures. We analyzed a Coastal Douglas-fir progeny test trial located in British Columbia, Canada, and developed a new method to estimate branch attributes from RPAS-LS data for inclusion as selection criteria in tree improvement programs. Branch length, angle, width, and volume were estimated for each tree. Narrow-sense heritability (the proportion of variation due to genetics) and genetic correlations were also estimated. The method extracted branch length with a correlation (r) of 0.93 compared to manual measurements. Using these branch attributes, results then show that branch angle had the highest heritability (0.277), while tree height and branch length had the highest genetic correlation (0.668). These findings are encouraging for forest managers as they indicate that branch level metrics should be considered when selecting trees in breeding programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it